<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optimism Fading?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socalbubble.com/2006/07/optimism-fading.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2006/07/optimism-fading.html</link>
	<description>Southern California is Experiencing a Real Estate Bubble like never before</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 01:16:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Doe</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2006/07/optimism-fading.html/comment-page-1#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>John Doe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2006/07/optimism-fading.html#comment-713</guid>
		<description>B.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;You&#039;re definitely right.  Although there is a need to return to historical levels, there is a good chance that with all of the negativity, we could potentially overcorrect for several years below true equilibrium.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I&#039;m convinced that&#039;s what happened in some areas during the mid-90&#039;s.  The resulting up-swing for 5 years (97-01) was just returning to some kind of equilibruim.  The 02-03 years are a question mark, but 04-05 are clearly classic bubble action.  06 is the weightless year, and gravity will begin to bring us down in 07.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re definitely right.  Although there is a need to return to historical levels, there is a good chance that with all of the negativity, we could potentially overcorrect for several years below true equilibrium.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m convinced that&#8217;s what happened in some areas during the mid-90&#8242;s.  The resulting up-swing for 5 years (97-01) was just returning to some kind of equilibruim.  The 02-03 years are a question mark, but 04-05 are clearly classic bubble action.  06 is the weightless year, and gravity will begin to bring us down in 07.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Durbin</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2006/07/optimism-fading.html/comment-page-1#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Durbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 02:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2006/07/optimism-fading.html#comment-714</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s also the fact that the housing market does follow herd behavior. With that many people thinking there&#039;s a crash in the offing, there&#039;s going to be a bit of &quot;self-fulfilling prophecy&quot; as people stay away from the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s also the fact that the housing market does follow herd behavior. With that many people thinking there&#8217;s a crash in the offing, there&#8217;s going to be a bit of &#8220;self-fulfilling prophecy&#8221; as people stay away from the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Doe</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2006/07/optimism-fading.html/comment-page-1#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>John Doe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2006/07/optimism-fading.html#comment-715</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know.  55.7% said that a MAJOR Crash was likely.  Between the 16% that said they didn&#039;t care because they could never afford it, only 25% believe in a &quot;soft-landing&quot; or optimistic outcome for this.  I&#039;d say that&#039;s pretty significant, and I probably wouldn&#039;t call that denial.  For all we know, those 25% are all realtors.  Either way, I don&#039;t think sellers will be going into the transaction with eyes shut.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;John Doe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know.  55.7% said that a MAJOR Crash was likely.  Between the 16% that said they didn&#8217;t care because they could never afford it, only 25% believe in a &#8220;soft-landing&#8221; or optimistic outcome for this.  I&#8217;d say that&#8217;s pretty significant, and I probably wouldn&#8217;t call that denial.  For all we know, those 25% are all realtors.  Either way, I don&#8217;t think sellers will be going into the transaction with eyes shut.</p>
<p>John Doe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patient renter</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2006/07/optimism-fading.html/comment-page-1#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>patient renter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 05:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2006/07/optimism-fading.html#comment-716</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s about as would be expected. Many people are going to get burned. Most people will probably be negatively effected. The first stage of loss (equity) is of course, denial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about as would be expected. Many people are going to get burned. Most people will probably be negatively effected. The first stage of loss (equity) is of course, denial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

