<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Orange Crush Part Deux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html</link>
	<description>Southern California is Experiencing a Real Estate Bubble like never before</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Ponzi</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-5459</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Ponzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 14:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-5459</guid>
		<description>Irvine Renter has a great blog and post dedicated to Irvine.

Check it out here:

http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/2007/05/14/the-anatomy-of-a-credit-bubble/

and here:

http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/2007/04/02/how-bad-could-bad-get/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irvine Renter has a great blog and post dedicated to Irvine.</p>
<p>Check it out here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/2007/05/14/the-anatomy-of-a-credit-bubble/" rel="nofollow">http://www.irvinehousingblog.c.....it-bubble/</a></p>
<p>and here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/2007/04/02/how-bad-could-bad-get/" rel="nofollow">http://www.irvinehousingblog.c.....d-bad-get/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AB</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-5424</link>
		<dc:creator>AB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 14:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-5424</guid>
		<description>Just curious then...

What's the housing situation in Irvine itself looking like?  Where can I find out more information regarding how far prices are expected to fall / have already fallen for Irvine in particular?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious then&#8230;</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the housing situation in Irvine itself looking like?  Where can I find out more information regarding how far prices are expected to fall / have already fallen for Irvine in particular?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ND</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3499</link>
		<dc:creator>ND</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 20:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3499</guid>
		<description>The starting salary for large law firms is now $145K/per (exclusive of bonuses).  If you are married to another attorney, that's $290K household income in the first year of practice.  That being said, law school loans can be huge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The starting salary for large law firms is now $145K/per (exclusive of bonuses).  If you are married to another attorney, that&#8217;s $290K household income in the first year of practice.  That being said, law school loans can be huge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hungry Teacher</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3492</link>
		<dc:creator>Hungry Teacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3492</guid>
		<description>Hey Chris... hehehe.. was just being bitter you know... the house it not worth 550k... they got lucky.. some sucker bought it. Incomes in Riverside do not justify the home prices out here and yet people still buy. That's what I was laughing at. :o) In fact, in 2001, it was valued at 210k (which I think is the "real" market value). It's funny how suckers are still paying the these houses.. ARM financing.. for sure..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chris&#8230; hehehe.. was just being bitter you know&#8230; the house it not worth 550k&#8230; they got lucky.. some sucker bought it. Incomes in Riverside do not justify the home prices out here and yet people still buy. That&#8217;s what I was laughing at. :o) In fact, in 2001, it was valued at 210k (which I think is the &#8220;real&#8221; market value). It&#8217;s funny how suckers are still paying the these houses.. ARM financing.. for sure..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3413</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 04:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3413</guid>
		<description>I think Hungry Teacher's point was that the expectation was an unrealistic profit margin over the past few years.  That can be something to chuckle at if the people were bragging about all the money they were going to make.

I think we all agree 100K in profit on a housing transaction is nothing to sneeze at.

I don't hate lawyers or RE agents.  That would be crazy.  When you need a good one of either group, they can be exceptionally helpful.  

RE agents are in a precarious position as their motivations are both for and against their clients simultaneously if you think about it.  A high sales price both helps their own bottom line, and "hurts" the client, for example.  I would find it difficult to work in that situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Hungry Teacher&#8217;s point was that the expectation was an unrealistic profit margin over the past few years.  That can be something to chuckle at if the people were bragging about all the money they were going to make.</p>
<p>I think we all agree 100K in profit on a housing transaction is nothing to sneeze at.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t hate lawyers or RE agents.  That would be crazy.  When you need a good one of either group, they can be exceptionally helpful.  </p>
<p>RE agents are in a precarious position as their motivations are both for and against their clients simultaneously if you think about it.  A high sales price both helps their own bottom line, and &#8220;hurts&#8221; the client, for example.  I would find it difficult to work in that situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWM in SD</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3383</link>
		<dc:creator>JWM in SD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 17:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3383</guid>
		<description>Why? Well, I'll tell you why. My wife and I earn very good incomes and we actually like to save money as opposed to spending it on Escalades, boob jobs, Mercedes, etc. I don't like the idea of a the REIC continually pumping dumb buyers into the market and letting them fall victim to bad lending standards so some douche bag mortgage broker/realtor can make a ridiculous amount for doing NOTHING!!! Then, when the stupid borrower / buyer goes into default, he wants a hand out from the Govt because they made a bad financial decision. Well guess who gets to pay for that? I do. 

For the past several years, the REIC has effectively waged a war against sane buyers and catered to the financially illiterate in the marketplace. Well, now that game is up and you have congress out there wanting for those of us who sat out the nonsense to pay for the excesses. 

NO FU**ING WAY!!!!

Is that clear enough for you???

***** Profanity Edited by Chuck Ponzi*****</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why? Well, I&#8217;ll tell you why. My wife and I earn very good incomes and we actually like to save money as opposed to spending it on Escalades, boob jobs, Mercedes, etc. I don&#8217;t like the idea of a the REIC continually pumping dumb buyers into the market and letting them fall victim to bad lending standards so some douche bag mortgage broker/realtor can make a ridiculous amount for doing NOTHING!!! Then, when the stupid borrower / buyer goes into default, he wants a hand out from the Govt because they made a bad financial decision. Well guess who gets to pay for that? I do. </p>
<p>For the past several years, the REIC has effectively waged a war against sane buyers and catered to the financially illiterate in the marketplace. Well, now that game is up and you have congress out there wanting for those of us who sat out the nonsense to pay for the excesses. </p>
<p>NO FU**ING WAY!!!!</p>
<p>Is that clear enough for you???</p>
<p>***** Profanity Edited by Chuck Ponzi*****</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joanovarq</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3382</link>
		<dc:creator>joanovarq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 16:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3382</guid>
		<description>Hungry Teacher: so they still made over $100K in profit?  Sounds pretty good to me!

Help-U-Buy Guy: I don't "hate" realtors. I'm a lawyer so I understand the concept of being in a hated profession.  My only concern about my realtor is whether he will advocate for my interests, given his viewpoint that my price expectations are unrealistic.  When he approaches the seller with my offer, is he going to take the "your house is a dump so you're lucky to be getting this offer" approach, or is he going to approach the seller with an attitude of "sorry the offer so low, but my client is unreasonable -- make a counteroffer and I'll try to reason with her"?  My realtor and I may have different views about how much property should cost -- and I don't care what he says to me in private -- but I hope that when he talks to the seller, he's out there negotiating hard for me to get the lowest price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hungry Teacher: so they still made over $100K in profit?  Sounds pretty good to me!</p>
<p>Help-U-Buy Guy: I don&#8217;t &#8220;hate&#8221; realtors. I&#8217;m a lawyer so I understand the concept of being in a hated profession.  My only concern about my realtor is whether he will advocate for my interests, given his viewpoint that my price expectations are unrealistic.  When he approaches the seller with my offer, is he going to take the &#8220;your house is a dump so you&#8217;re lucky to be getting this offer&#8221; approach, or is he going to approach the seller with an attitude of &#8220;sorry the offer so low, but my client is unreasonable &#8212; make a counteroffer and I&#8217;ll try to reason with her&#8221;?  My realtor and I may have different views about how much property should cost &#8212; and I don&#8217;t care what he says to me in private &#8212; but I hope that when he talks to the seller, he&#8217;s out there negotiating hard for me to get the lowest price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3381</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 16:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3381</guid>
		<description>Hungry Teacher.  So they bought something for 410k...sold it for 550k?  My guess is after commissions and fees the probably ended up with 525k if not more.  

So you are telling me that walking away with over 100k after having a house for 2 years is not good enough....so much so that you'll laugh out loud about it?  Wow.    

Stick to teaching...but please don't teach finances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hungry Teacher.  So they bought something for 410k&#8230;sold it for 550k?  My guess is after commissions and fees the probably ended up with 525k if not more.  </p>
<p>So you are telling me that walking away with over 100k after having a house for 2 years is not good enough&#8230;.so much so that you&#8217;ll laugh out loud about it?  Wow.    </p>
<p>Stick to teaching&#8230;but please don&#8217;t teach finances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hungry Teacher</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3352</link>
		<dc:creator>Hungry Teacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 00:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3352</guid>
		<description>The house next to my parents were sold just a couple of weeks ago in Orangecrest, Riverside... They bought the place a couple of years back in hope of making a huge profit... hahahah.. well, they didn't. They paid 410k for the 2300 s.f. home early 2005. They sold it for only 550k.. minus at least 20k in fees... hehehe.. so much for real estat riches.. lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The house next to my parents were sold just a couple of weeks ago in Orangecrest, Riverside&#8230; They bought the place a couple of years back in hope of making a huge profit&#8230; hahahah.. well, they didn&#8217;t. They paid 410k for the 2300 s.f. home early 2005. They sold it for only 550k.. minus at least 20k in fees&#8230; hehehe.. so much for real estat riches.. lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Ponzi</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3287</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Ponzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3287</guid>
		<description>Hey Brad,

I've found that most of the readers of bubble blogs don't hate real estate agents.  They hate liars.  Unfortunately, there are too many agents who are allowed to opine about things they know nothing about.

Good negotiating tactics:  yes, good agents have these, and this is critical in dealing with a specific property at a specific price.
Good forecasting abilities with respect to the real estate market:  If any, usually only limited to near-term and in a specific microcosm.  Not good for determining the direction of a region as large as the Southern California over the next 3 to 5 years.

Unfortuntately for many readers, their anger is misplaced.  The better question is, why is the CNN news channel or the LA times pitting Gary Watts against Robert Schiller?  That's a mental giant compared with a toadstool (if you don't know which is which, you need to research more).  Watts makes up his figures; Robert Schiller works on nobel-prize worthy economics theory based on original research.  The fact remains that there are incompetent people in every profession.  Their profession alone does not qualify them to be quotable.  In fact, if the media had a healthy dose of skepticism, they might ask if there is some motivation to see the market in a specific light.

The ignorant media is who people should be taking on.  A cause that OCRenter has taken up at bubbletracking.blogspot.com by researching the "man on the street" background stories that the LA Times and its ilk are creating headlines about.

Newspapers can write anything their publishers will allow.  It doesn't mean it's right.

I think you're right.  I think the market is still moving... albeit a lot slower and slightly lower.  Time will only tell if I am right.  I'm probably about as confident about my prediction as Watts' was about his, though.  The difference is that I have a healthy level of skepticism, he is slanted in a most inobscure way.

Chuck Ponzi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Brad,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found that most of the readers of bubble blogs don&#8217;t hate real estate agents.  They hate liars.  Unfortunately, there are too many agents who are allowed to opine about things they know nothing about.</p>
<p>Good negotiating tactics:  yes, good agents have these, and this is critical in dealing with a specific property at a specific price.<br />
Good forecasting abilities with respect to the real estate market:  If any, usually only limited to near-term and in a specific microcosm.  Not good for determining the direction of a region as large as the Southern California over the next 3 to 5 years.</p>
<p>Unfortuntately for many readers, their anger is misplaced.  The better question is, why is the CNN news channel or the LA times pitting Gary Watts against Robert Schiller?  That&#8217;s a mental giant compared with a toadstool (if you don&#8217;t know which is which, you need to research more).  Watts makes up his figures; Robert Schiller works on nobel-prize worthy economics theory based on original research.  The fact remains that there are incompetent people in every profession.  Their profession alone does not qualify them to be quotable.  In fact, if the media had a healthy dose of skepticism, they might ask if there is some motivation to see the market in a specific light.</p>
<p>The ignorant media is who people should be taking on.  A cause that OCRenter has taken up at bubbletracking.blogspot.com by researching the &#8220;man on the street&#8221; background stories that the LA Times and its ilk are creating headlines about.</p>
<p>Newspapers can write anything their publishers will allow.  It doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s right.</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re right.  I think the market is still moving&#8230; albeit a lot slower and slightly lower.  Time will only tell if I am right.  I&#8217;m probably about as confident about my prediction as Watts&#8217; was about his, though.  The difference is that I have a healthy level of skepticism, he is slanted in a most inobscure way.</p>
<p>Chuck Ponzi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We Help-U-Buy Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3286</link>
		<dc:creator>We Help-U-Buy Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3286</guid>
		<description>I don't encourage my clients to pay more.  I do try to manage their expectations though.  If a comp from November is $625K you should expect to pay a little less if the properties are the same, but if you're hoping to pick it up at $50K-$75K off that recent comp it's probably not going to happen.

I know a lot of you hate real estate agents but it's a balancing act.  I make low ball offers and encourage my clients to be agressive.  However, I've lost more  than one client that didn't get a house they wanted because we came in low and someone else ended up getting the property.  It sucks for me to lose an $800K sale because I was trying to save my client $50K and then I also lose the client.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t encourage my clients to pay more.  I do try to manage their expectations though.  If a comp from November is $625K you should expect to pay a little less if the properties are the same, but if you&#8217;re hoping to pick it up at $50K-$75K off that recent comp it&#8217;s probably not going to happen.</p>
<p>I know a lot of you hate real estate agents but it&#8217;s a balancing act.  I make low ball offers and encourage my clients to be agressive.  However, I&#8217;ve lost more  than one client that didn&#8217;t get a house they wanted because we came in low and someone else ended up getting the property.  It sucks for me to lose an $800K sale because I was trying to save my client $50K and then I also lose the client.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LAEF2</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3285</link>
		<dc:creator>LAEF2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3285</guid>
		<description>You can always have fun with the reverse pressure tactics. Look for someone that is seeling but not at a short sale.

Throw out a 500-525K offer with a short fuse.

Even if there is a huge drop; you will probably be OK over the long haul.

Give them some time frame like 2 Months.

After a month of nothing happening they might crack and dramatically lower their price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can always have fun with the reverse pressure tactics. Look for someone that is seeling but not at a short sale.</p>
<p>Throw out a 500-525K offer with a short fuse.</p>
<p>Even if there is a huge drop; you will probably be OK over the long haul.</p>
<p>Give them some time frame like 2 Months.</p>
<p>After a month of nothing happening they might crack and dramatically lower their price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanovarq</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3283</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanovarq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3283</guid>
		<description>Nate, I think the reason the builders aren't lowering their prices is that they don't want all the other similar houses in the same development to drop in value.  That hurts the builder who is still trying to sell, and it pisses off all the neighbors who bought similar houses in the same development who bought last year.  What I've read is that the builders are not lowering their official prices, but they're throwing in incentives, such as upgrades, paying your closing costs, paying your mortgage for a certain number of months, giving away a cruise or a new car, etc.  That way, they can still write on the deed that the house cost $700K but it really cost you less because of all the free stuff they gave you.  But keep in mind that if the recorded sale price is $700K, that's the price upon which your property taxes will be based.

Help-U-Buy Guy, you sound just like my Realtor!  He is saying the same things, trying to convince me to offer more.  Everyone is *asking* for over $600K in this neighborhood, but I have seen no evidence that any buyer has actually paid those prices any time recently.  People paid between $550K-$625K between spring and November of 2006, but that was LAST YEAR, before all the subprime stuff hit the fan.  Also, I've seen 2 houses in pre-foreclosure and one short sale in this very neighborhood, within a few blocks of each other, and although those people are still listing their properties for high prices, their Realtors say they are "very flexible."  So I think there are some sellers who might be willing to deal.

Although other sellers may have no urgency to sell, I also have no urgency to buy, since I rent a wonderful rent-controlled duplex which is nicer than half the stuff people are trying to sell for $500K.  If I make an offer and the seller says no, what have I lost?   I'll just try again next year when the foreclosure rates are higher.  There will always be another house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate, I think the reason the builders aren&#8217;t lowering their prices is that they don&#8217;t want all the other similar houses in the same development to drop in value.  That hurts the builder who is still trying to sell, and it pisses off all the neighbors who bought similar houses in the same development who bought last year.  What I&#8217;ve read is that the builders are not lowering their official prices, but they&#8217;re throwing in incentives, such as upgrades, paying your closing costs, paying your mortgage for a certain number of months, giving away a cruise or a new car, etc.  That way, they can still write on the deed that the house cost $700K but it really cost you less because of all the free stuff they gave you.  But keep in mind that if the recorded sale price is $700K, that&#8217;s the price upon which your property taxes will be based.</p>
<p>Help-U-Buy Guy, you sound just like my Realtor!  He is saying the same things, trying to convince me to offer more.  Everyone is *asking* for over $600K in this neighborhood, but I have seen no evidence that any buyer has actually paid those prices any time recently.  People paid between $550K-$625K between spring and November of 2006, but that was LAST YEAR, before all the subprime stuff hit the fan.  Also, I&#8217;ve seen 2 houses in pre-foreclosure and one short sale in this very neighborhood, within a few blocks of each other, and although those people are still listing their properties for high prices, their Realtors say they are &#8220;very flexible.&#8221;  So I think there are some sellers who might be willing to deal.</p>
<p>Although other sellers may have no urgency to sell, I also have no urgency to buy, since I rent a wonderful rent-controlled duplex which is nicer than half the stuff people are trying to sell for $500K.  If I make an offer and the seller says no, what have I lost?   I&#8217;ll just try again next year when the foreclosure rates are higher.  There will always be another house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvie</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3264</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3264</guid>
		<description>Don't buy in the IE Nate. It's going to be the land of massive foreclosures soon. I lived there for over twenty years. It's become a crowded suburban hell mostly low pay service jobs and cookie cutter houses. It's become overbuilt and expensive I remember not to long ago when nobody wanted to admit they lived there. If you have to live inland I would suggest Claremont it is at least within the LA county border. It is an academic town with classy educated people and the downtown is lovely. It reminds of an East coast college town. The homes there are more custom and they have a nice artist colony. I lived there for two years I enjoyed it very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t buy in the IE Nate. It&#8217;s going to be the land of massive foreclosures soon. I lived there for over twenty years. It&#8217;s become a crowded suburban hell mostly low pay service jobs and cookie cutter houses. It&#8217;s become overbuilt and expensive I remember not to long ago when nobody wanted to admit they lived there. If you have to live inland I would suggest Claremont it is at least within the LA county border. It is an academic town with classy educated people and the downtown is lovely. It reminds of an East coast college town. The homes there are more custom and they have a nice artist colony. I lived there for two years I enjoyed it very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We Help-U-Buy Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3256</link>
		<dc:creator>We Help-U-Buy Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3256</guid>
		<description>I have quite a few clients who are looking to steal properties these days.  I’m happy to put in low offers but it’s not a reasonable expectation to hope to get a property for $500K in a $600K neighborhood.  

Why? There is no desperation amongst sellers.  Plenty of homes are still selling and the properties that are priced well sell quickly.  No one is walking away from $100K in equity.  If it is a neighborhood of $600K homes you can sell fast at $550K.  Why take $500K?  

I have clients who think they can steal a bank owned property.  Banks don’t give away money.  They sell at market value.  All the bank owned homes you see listed (and I see new ones listed almost daily) are all priced at the low end of market value.  They don’t want to hold these properties but know that they are still selling.  Hence, banks reject low ball offers.  Banks have a formula whereby if a property doesn’t sell at the asking price in a certain number of days, they will lower the price incrementally (2% to 3%) until they hit the price at which it will sell.  

If you are hoping for 20% off, you are going to have to wait.  It’s not going to happen all at once (if at all).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have quite a few clients who are looking to steal properties these days.  I’m happy to put in low offers but it’s not a reasonable expectation to hope to get a property for $500K in a $600K neighborhood.  </p>
<p>Why? There is no desperation amongst sellers.  Plenty of homes are still selling and the properties that are priced well sell quickly.  No one is walking away from $100K in equity.  If it is a neighborhood of $600K homes you can sell fast at $550K.  Why take $500K?  </p>
<p>I have clients who think they can steal a bank owned property.  Banks don’t give away money.  They sell at market value.  All the bank owned homes you see listed (and I see new ones listed almost daily) are all priced at the low end of market value.  They don’t want to hold these properties but know that they are still selling.  Hence, banks reject low ball offers.  Banks have a formula whereby if a property doesn’t sell at the asking price in a certain number of days, they will lower the price incrementally (2% to 3%) until they hit the price at which it will sell.  </p>
<p>If you are hoping for 20% off, you are going to have to wait.  It’s not going to happen all at once (if at all).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3252</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3252</guid>
		<description>I would discourage you from buying a mobile home.  Mobile Homes are not mainstream or the norm and financing is few and far between.  That isn't to say that you can't get qualified because the financing does exist...it's just to say that when it comes time for you to sell it you will probably have a difficult time trying to find a buyer to qualify for it, because qualifying for a mobile is simply very strict.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would discourage you from buying a mobile home.  Mobile Homes are not mainstream or the norm and financing is few and far between.  That isn&#8217;t to say that you can&#8217;t get qualified because the financing does exist&#8230;it&#8217;s just to say that when it comes time for you to sell it you will probably have a difficult time trying to find a buyer to qualify for it, because qualifying for a mobile is simply very strict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rkp</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3221</link>
		<dc:creator>rkp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3221</guid>
		<description>Regarding OC income, $250K household income for OC doesn't surprise me.  This isn't a single breadwinner bringing home $250K - it is multiple people working full time.  I am not saying this is the norm but it isn't uncommon either.  

Both my wife are in high-tech, late 20's and together, we earn $225K+.  I know this isn't common but most of my friends who work at high-tech companies in OC make similar amounts and we are all about the same age.  

What really surprises me are all the people who bought these inflated houses with much less household income when I can not rationalize putting so much of my gross towards the mortgage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding OC income, $250K household income for OC doesn&#8217;t surprise me.  This isn&#8217;t a single breadwinner bringing home $250K - it is multiple people working full time.  I am not saying this is the norm but it isn&#8217;t uncommon either.  </p>
<p>Both my wife are in high-tech, late 20&#8217;s and together, we earn $225K+.  I know this isn&#8217;t common but most of my friends who work at high-tech companies in OC make similar amounts and we are all about the same age.  </p>
<p>What really surprises me are all the people who bought these inflated houses with much less household income when I can not rationalize putting so much of my gross towards the mortgage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3206</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 04:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3206</guid>
		<description>I agree.  I was low balled on my house up north and I just rejected the offer.  The full price offer was not too far behind from the same people who were just "testing the waters" up front.  I'm not terribly desperate to sell and can hang on for a long time if I have to (I'll just continue to rent in So. Cal) but if I were desperate, I might have taken the 10% discount offer they started with.  I think I'd start at 100K less than asking and just see in RC.  

You are right, there is nothing lost in a rejected offer with no counter back.  Just have to do it to find out how anxious/desperate the seller is.

I continue to wonder, however, where the big builders sit in all of this.  How will they move inventories when there is so much existing product on the market?  I'm confused as to why they haven't lowered prices significantly.  I think it is because they don't have to---they are big corporations with different pressures than those of us individual home owners.  Also, they still "sell" a lot of homes.  It remains to be seen if those that are "sold" (read: they have a deposit) actually close in the way we are accustomed to using the term "sold".

Chuck, I have my income because I stayed in school a very long time.  There was no magic in it.  I am blessed with my current employment situation.  I also know I know very little about real estate: it is a different language.  I like reading these posts because you all have taught me so much.  My wife, thankfully, is also very patient, but the information I get here helps to reduce her anxiety over not owning our own home yet.  I think it will be well into 2008 before we pull the trigger, but maybe Joanovarq has a point, low ball some people and just see what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  I was low balled on my house up north and I just rejected the offer.  The full price offer was not too far behind from the same people who were just &#8220;testing the waters&#8221; up front.  I&#8217;m not terribly desperate to sell and can hang on for a long time if I have to (I&#8217;ll just continue to rent in So. Cal) but if I were desperate, I might have taken the 10% discount offer they started with.  I think I&#8217;d start at 100K less than asking and just see in RC.  </p>
<p>You are right, there is nothing lost in a rejected offer with no counter back.  Just have to do it to find out how anxious/desperate the seller is.</p>
<p>I continue to wonder, however, where the big builders sit in all of this.  How will they move inventories when there is so much existing product on the market?  I&#8217;m confused as to why they haven&#8217;t lowered prices significantly.  I think it is because they don&#8217;t have to&#8212;they are big corporations with different pressures than those of us individual home owners.  Also, they still &#8220;sell&#8221; a lot of homes.  It remains to be seen if those that are &#8220;sold&#8221; (read: they have a deposit) actually close in the way we are accustomed to using the term &#8220;sold&#8221;.</p>
<p>Chuck, I have my income because I stayed in school a very long time.  There was no magic in it.  I am blessed with my current employment situation.  I also know I know very little about real estate: it is a different language.  I like reading these posts because you all have taught me so much.  My wife, thankfully, is also very patient, but the information I get here helps to reduce her anxiety over not owning our own home yet.  I think it will be well into 2008 before we pull the trigger, but maybe Joanovarq has a point, low ball some people and just see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanovarq</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3205</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanovarq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 03:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3205</guid>
		<description>To the guy thinking of buying the $700K house in Rancho Cucamonga -- I say go ahead and put in an offer at the price you want to pay.  If the builder says "NO" you can always increase your offer.  But always remember your first offer is the lowest you can go, so make it low (who knows, they  might say yes)

I am facing a similar situation; I want to buy an existing home for around $500K, but everyone is asking over $600K in the neighborhood I want.  I intend to make some offers at the price I think is fair -- if they say no, nothing lost.  I am torn between whether to start lowballing now or wait a year or so until lenders and borrowers are really hurting due to the mountain of impending foreclosures...

I expect prices to go down 20% over the next few years, so I am factoring that into my offering price.  With more houses on the market due to foreclosures, and fewer buyers available since people with weak credit will no longer qualify for $600K mortgages, prices have to come down -- simple supply &#38; demand.  The only question is how much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the guy thinking of buying the $700K house in Rancho Cucamonga &#8212; I say go ahead and put in an offer at the price you want to pay.  If the builder says &#8220;NO&#8221; you can always increase your offer.  But always remember your first offer is the lowest you can go, so make it low (who knows, they  might say yes)</p>
<p>I am facing a similar situation; I want to buy an existing home for around $500K, but everyone is asking over $600K in the neighborhood I want.  I intend to make some offers at the price I think is fair &#8212; if they say no, nothing lost.  I am torn between whether to start lowballing now or wait a year or so until lenders and borrowers are really hurting due to the mountain of impending foreclosures&#8230;</p>
<p>I expect prices to go down 20% over the next few years, so I am factoring that into my offering price.  With more houses on the market due to foreclosures, and fewer buyers available since people with weak credit will no longer qualify for $600K mortgages, prices have to come down &#8212; simple supply &amp; demand.  The only question is how much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMG</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3203</link>
		<dc:creator>MMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 03:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3203</guid>
		<description>builders are already cutting 
50-100 k off prices. I went to a grand opening in san juan capistrano, new almost 3000 sqft homes with some ocean view going for 980k, so somewhere around 310 per sq foot.

this was before the tidal wave of bad new over the past 3 weeks.

for those who make 250k that means you take home around 12-13k. rent for 2500(in rancho that would get a very nice house), put the difference between rent and morg payment (about 2k) in a CD. in a year or two you will have more money.

houses will have stayed the same (dont think so) or much lower (with credit tightening) so you get a bigger house for your money.

thats what I'm doing.   GOOD LUCK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>builders are already cutting<br />
50-100 k off prices. I went to a grand opening in san juan capistrano, new almost 3000 sqft homes with some ocean view going for 980k, so somewhere around 310 per sq foot.</p>
<p>this was before the tidal wave of bad new over the past 3 weeks.</p>
<p>for those who make 250k that means you take home around 12-13k. rent for 2500(in rancho that would get a very nice house), put the difference between rent and morg payment (about 2k) in a CD. in a year or two you will have more money.</p>
<p>houses will have stayed the same (dont think so) or much lower (with credit tightening) so you get a bigger house for your money.</p>
<p>thats what I&#8217;m doing.   GOOD LUCK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3197</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 02:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3197</guid>
		<description>Yuck.  I was hoping for a 10-15% drop in new construction.  I guess I'm dreaming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yuck.  I was hoping for a 10-15% drop in new construction.  I guess I&#8217;m dreaming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3196</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 02:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3196</guid>
		<description>I say stay in your apartment and enjoy your summers off. Don't buy the mobile home.Shop around and be sure to tell potential lenders you are a teacher.  There might be special programs for you just as there are programs for veterans, health professionals, etc, in certain markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say stay in your apartment and enjoy your summers off. Don&#8217;t buy the mobile home.Shop around and be sure to tell potential lenders you are a teacher.  There might be special programs for you just as there are programs for veterans, health professionals, etc, in certain markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IrvineRenter</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3195</link>
		<dc:creator>IrvineRenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 01:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3195</guid>
		<description>"I would ignore most of the extreme bears you read on this board. It is unlikely you’ll see a huge yoy decline of prices as some speculate here…if these doomsdayers are so sure….they’ll make a mint on the Shiller Index…but they’ll never put their money on the line."

You are a presumptuous, arrogant and ignorant all at the same time. It would please me to learn you are a recent home buyer. If not, you should go out and buy one. Come back in two or three years and let us know how it is working out for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I would ignore most of the extreme bears you read on this board. It is unlikely you’ll see a huge yoy decline of prices as some speculate here…if these doomsdayers are so sure….they’ll make a mint on the Shiller Index…but they’ll never put their money on the line.&#8221;</p>
<p>You are a presumptuous, arrogant and ignorant all at the same time. It would please me to learn you are a recent home buyer. If not, you should go out and buy one. Come back in two or three years and let us know how it is working out for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Ponzi</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3189</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Ponzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3189</guid>
		<description>Mobile Homes are flotsam and debris in down markets.  And, frankly, they are a lot more headache than I think they are worth.  Your neighbors tend to be of a poorer quality than in an apartment.  Unless you have a piece of land to put it on, I wouldn't personally consider it.

Reselling one is a nightmare.  They cost about 50K to build, and sell for 120K new.  Then, you can resell them for 50K.  The depreciation on them is absurd.

With that said, I'm not in your position, so I can't really give good advice.  What I would do and what you would do are 2 different things.  I can say that housing will get cheaper, and that condos will suffer more than houses.

Chuck Ponzi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mobile Homes are flotsam and debris in down markets.  And, frankly, they are a lot more headache than I think they are worth.  Your neighbors tend to be of a poorer quality than in an apartment.  Unless you have a piece of land to put it on, I wouldn&#8217;t personally consider it.</p>
<p>Reselling one is a nightmare.  They cost about 50K to build, and sell for 120K new.  Then, you can resell them for 50K.  The depreciation on them is absurd.</p>
<p>With that said, I&#8217;m not in your position, so I can&#8217;t really give good advice.  What I would do and what you would do are 2 different things.  I can say that housing will get cheaper, and that condos will suffer more than houses.</p>
<p>Chuck Ponzi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LAEF2</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3182</link>
		<dc:creator>LAEF2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/03/the-orange-crush-part-deux.html#comment-3182</guid>
		<description>Sit and wait in the apartment. 

This housing bubble has made affordability impossible for the good people called to teaching.

Prices will eventually realign so that you can get a place. Otherwise we will also have to deal with rising wages to attract teachers soon.

So either prices drop or wages will go up sharply in the future. Have hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sit and wait in the apartment. </p>
<p>This housing bubble has made affordability impossible for the good people called to teaching.</p>
<p>Prices will eventually realign so that you can get a place. Otherwise we will also have to deal with rising wages to attract teachers soon.</p>
<p>So either prices drop or wages will go up sharply in the future. Have hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
