<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Succulent Santa Ana Subprime Squish-down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html</link>
	<description>Southern California is Experiencing a Real Estate Bubble like never before</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 01:16:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkusArelius</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html/comment-page-1#comment-10907</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkusArelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html#comment-10907</guid>
		<description>Great post.
One might ponder whether in Santa Ana some of the mortgage lenders may eventually be hauled into court and be accused of deceptive lending practices by the large immigrant contingent (both legal and illegal) that resides in Santa Ana?
 
Wow, if you&#039;re a trial lawyer get ready to make some money, right?

Not so sure.  First, a lot of these lenders will be rotting corpses by the time lawsuits are filed. Not much money to win anymore, unless they go after the State of California for failing to regulate.  Like taxes?  

Second, not sure there exists a legal foot to stand on since attorneys woulod be clamoring for the &quot;murder weapon&quot;, a.k.a. the gun that was put to the mortgage signatory&#039;s head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.<br />
One might ponder whether in Santa Ana some of the mortgage lenders may eventually be hauled into court and be accused of deceptive lending practices by the large immigrant contingent (both legal and illegal) that resides in Santa Ana?</p>
<p>Wow, if you&#8217;re a trial lawyer get ready to make some money, right?</p>
<p>Not so sure.  First, a lot of these lenders will be rotting corpses by the time lawsuits are filed. Not much money to win anymore, unless they go after the State of California for failing to regulate.  Like taxes?  </p>
<p>Second, not sure there exists a legal foot to stand on since attorneys woulod be clamoring for the &#8220;murder weapon&#8221;, a.k.a. the gun that was put to the mortgage signatory&#8217;s head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html/comment-page-1#comment-10788</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html#comment-10788</guid>
		<description>http://thegreatloanblog.blogspot.com/

Disturbing info from a large prime wholesaler. Signed docs and they may not fund the loan because it is unsaleable according to the Wall St banks like Goldman or Bear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thegreatloanblog.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://thegreatloanblog.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>Disturbing info from a large prime wholesaler. Signed docs and they may not fund the loan because it is unsaleable according to the Wall St banks like Goldman or Bear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html/comment-page-1#comment-10787</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html#comment-10787</guid>
		<description>Disturbing info from a large prime wholesaler. Signed docs and they may not fund the loan because it is unsaleable according to the Wall St banks like Goldman or Bear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disturbing info from a large prime wholesaler. Signed docs and they may not fund the loan because it is unsaleable according to the Wall St banks like Goldman or Bear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Kid</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html/comment-page-1#comment-10773</link>
		<dc:creator>California Kid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html#comment-10773</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s amazing (as Huell Houser would say), listening to the analysts on Wall Street now singing a different song.  It was just weeks ago they indicated that the market is strong and would not be effected by the &quot;insignificant&quot; sub-prime issues.... just like a typical weatherman who doesn&#039;t know ____!  They indicated today no problems in the standard conventional lending world, just show up with the minimum 20% down and required documentation.... who are they kidding for those looking at a $750,000 typical home purchase in California.  $150,000 down  your ready to roll with a $600,000 mortgage @ 6.9% for 30 years with a total monthly house payment including taxes and insurance of $4600 +/-....yes, please sign me up quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing (as Huell Houser would say), listening to the analysts on Wall Street now singing a different song.  It was just weeks ago they indicated that the market is strong and would not be effected by the &#8220;insignificant&#8221; sub-prime issues&#8230;. just like a typical weatherman who doesn&#8217;t know ____!  They indicated today no problems in the standard conventional lending world, just show up with the minimum 20% down and required documentation&#8230;. who are they kidding for those looking at a $750,000 typical home purchase in California.  $150,000 down  your ready to roll with a $600,000 mortgage @ 6.9% for 30 years with a total monthly house payment including taxes and insurance of $4600 +/-&#8230;.yes, please sign me up quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LAEF2</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html/comment-page-1#comment-10763</link>
		<dc:creator>LAEF2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html#comment-10763</guid>
		<description>Never mind. The something something billion disapeared into the swirling vortex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind. The something something billion disapeared into the swirling vortex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LAEF2</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html/comment-page-1#comment-10762</link>
		<dc:creator>LAEF2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html#comment-10762</guid>
		<description>Fed injected some more cash today.

The inflation will be massive when it finaly trickles down.

The other thing to consider in this cycle is the normal buisness cycles and how much overspending was done on the cheap credit.

So, there was probably borrowing against the future there as well. This should all keep rolling in over the next couple of years.

The FED tinkering is probably going to cause all of the down cycles to suddenly line up.

so... great depression here we come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fed injected some more cash today.</p>
<p>The inflation will be massive when it finaly trickles down.</p>
<p>The other thing to consider in this cycle is the normal buisness cycles and how much overspending was done on the cheap credit.</p>
<p>So, there was probably borrowing against the future there as well. This should all keep rolling in over the next couple of years.</p>
<p>The FED tinkering is probably going to cause all of the down cycles to suddenly line up.</p>
<p>so&#8230; great depression here we come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Ponzi</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html/comment-page-1#comment-10759</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Ponzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html#comment-10759</guid>
		<description>From the same Article:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Cyclical factors may also be at work. Real interest rates may prove unsustainably low: if so, a crash may follow soaring house prices.

A risk also exists of self-sustaining upward (and on the opposite side of the cycle, downward) spirals: higher house prices lead to more borrowing and spending, faster economic expansion, still higher house prices, and so forth. When prices fall, however, declining housing equity, shrinking borrowing and spending and widespread defaults may generate a contraction in economic activity and in house prices.

A big question therefore is whether house prices have overshot equilibrium levels.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the same Article:</p>
<blockquote><p>Cyclical factors may also be at work. Real interest rates may prove unsustainably low: if so, a crash may follow soaring house prices.</p>
<p>A risk also exists of self-sustaining upward (and on the opposite side of the cycle, downward) spirals: higher house prices lead to more borrowing and spending, faster economic expansion, still higher house prices, and so forth. When prices fall, however, declining housing equity, shrinking borrowing and spending and widespread defaults may generate a contraction in economic activity and in house prices.</p>
<p>A big question therefore is whether house prices have overshot equilibrium levels.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Ponzi</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html/comment-page-1#comment-10758</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Ponzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html#comment-10758</guid>
		<description>Already over 1 year ago, Martin Wolf understood that you can&#039;t have your cake and eat it too.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/b7e8023c-cc82-11da-a423-0000779e2340.html



&lt;blockquote&gt;Where prices have risen far faster than underlying incomes, only two possibilities exist.

Either prices have moved to a higher equilibrium level, in which case future purchasers will have to save more and consume less. That would itself have significant economic implications. Or they have reached an unsustainable level, in which case they will fall in real terms. That would have far more significant economic implications.

The future will tell us which and where – possibly quite soon.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Excellent article and read.  I recommend it highly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Already over 1 year ago, Martin Wolf understood that you can&#8217;t have your cake and eat it too.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/b7e8023c-cc82-11da-a423-0000779e2340.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ft.com/cms/s/b7e802.....e2340.html</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Where prices have risen far faster than underlying incomes, only two possibilities exist.</p>
<p>Either prices have moved to a higher equilibrium level, in which case future purchasers will have to save more and consume less. That would itself have significant economic implications. Or they have reached an unsustainable level, in which case they will fall in real terms. That would have far more significant economic implications.</p>
<p>The future will tell us which and where – possibly quite soon.</p></blockquote>
<p>Excellent article and read.  I recommend it highly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lowrydr310</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html/comment-page-1#comment-10751</link>
		<dc:creator>lowrydr310</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html#comment-10751</guid>
		<description>&quot;the median income has not made a substantial move in the past 7 years&quot;

This is the thing that gets me most. Prices went through the roof, but incomes have not. The average income in 2000 was (almost) enough money to buy the average priced home in 2000 assuming standard loan terms (20% down, good credit history, low debt-to-income).

I still see a lot of people say &quot;But this is California, things are differnt. We&#039;ll never see 50% price declines&quot; Sure, there are lot of high income families in California who can support high prices, but wait and see what happens when there are twice as many homes for sale as there are buyers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the median income has not made a substantial move in the past 7 years&#8221;</p>
<p>This is the thing that gets me most. Prices went through the roof, but incomes have not. The average income in 2000 was (almost) enough money to buy the average priced home in 2000 assuming standard loan terms (20% down, good credit history, low debt-to-income).</p>
<p>I still see a lot of people say &#8220;But this is California, things are differnt. We&#8217;ll never see 50% price declines&#8221; Sure, there are lot of high income families in California who can support high prices, but wait and see what happens when there are twice as many homes for sale as there are buyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: v</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html/comment-page-1#comment-10720</link>
		<dc:creator>v</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 06:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/2007/08/succulent-santa-ana-subprime-squish-down.html#comment-10720</guid>
		<description>Why would you buy a home when you can&#039;t understand the documentation?...That blows my mind!.

I&#039;ve been reading your site stealthly since last October and you&#039;ve been right on the money by the way.

Not only will prices fall, but a lot of marriages will fail. So not only will there be ton of houses on the market there will be a ton of milfs&#039;s too...I wonder if anyone on Camille street needs a Sancho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you buy a home when you can&#8217;t understand the documentation?&#8230;That blows my mind!.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been reading your site stealthly since last October and you&#8217;ve been right on the money by the way.</p>
<p>Not only will prices fall, but a lot of marriages will fail. So not only will there be ton of houses on the market there will be a ton of milfs&#8217;s too&#8230;I wonder if anyone on Camille street needs a Sancho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

