|  home  |   My Profile  |   The Forum

Bailout Plans Stink to High Heaven

Chuck Ponzi June 21st, 2008

If you’re not in the know on the recent bailout news, there are 3 main points to be aware of:

1. It seems that Bank of America essentially wrote the Dodd Bailout Bill along with Countrywide (merger expected soon). They have probably the most to gain with a generous bailout bill. It helps noone since it doesn’t resolve the fundamental problem of affordability in house, in fact it makes the problem worse. Ever wonder why the 90’s in Japan were referred to as the “lost decade”? It’s because their banking system did the same thing we’re trying to do here. Anyone else see the problem with not punishing gambling banks and housing speculators?

2. The “Subprime Six” were a group of lawmakers given special treatment in exchange for what? What exactly did Senator Dodd besides favorable treatment in his housing financing? What else could be lurking in his past? If you haven’t read about the “Subprime Six”, follow the link. Investor Business Daily, the Wall Street Journal, and the LA times have picked up the story. It’s a story of insider grift and political pandering. If it weren’t so real and true, it might remind me of one of my favorite film lines:

Stuart: Well, it’s a well-known fact, Sunny Jim, that there’s a secret society of the five wealthiest people in the world, known as “The Pentavret.” Who run everything in the world, including the newspapers, and meet tri-annually at a secret country mansion in Colorado known as “The Meadows.”
Tony: So, who’s in this “Pentavret?”
Stuart: The Queen, the Vatican, the Gettys, the Rothschilds, and Colonel Sanders before he went tits up. Oooh, I hated the Colonel, with his wee beady eyes and that smug look on his face. “Oooh you’re gonna buy my chicken, oooh…”
Charlie: Dad? How can you hate the Colonel?
Stuart: Because he puts an addictive chemical in his chicken that makes you crave it fortnightly, smartass.

3. For all of the crap that our President Bush gets, at least he has the foresight to threaten a veto to said bill. There should be no bailout, not just because it’s not fair and would embolden speculators, but because it’s destined to put our banking system in jeapordy for the forseeable future with taxpayers footing the bill. It’s generally understood that this bill has to be done and voted on by July 4th if it is to carry. Any senator that signs this (if it passes) is hopefully going to be thoroughly trounced in the upcoming elections. This is not only unreasonable, it’s unamerican. This place is going to hell in a handbasket. If something like that goes through, I’ll be posting a list of every person that voted for it and their political affiliation here as a feature story.

So, what do I recommend? I’d say get a year’s worth of food and 6 month’s worth of remaining expenses together, if our politicians have any say in it, this is going to be one whopper of a crash and accompanying recession. On the lighter side of things, our grandchildren will be still paying so that people like this can “keep” their homes (and by homes, I mean plural, because, isn’t every good American not just entitled, but guaranteed to own more than one house?).

RSS feed

3 Comments »

Comment by Nick
2008-06-22 09:02:29

Could not agree more with the sentiment. The eventual passage or failure of bailout legislation will be a lasting testament to both the depth of corruption in our Congress, and the stupidity and lack of long-term judgment of its members. It’s a truly glaring reflection of you as a legislator when you are making Bush look like an intelligent, deep, long-term thinker compared to you.

 
Comment by LAEF2
2008-06-23 06:20:06

I don’t know how much of an effect the bailout will have. Some of the analysis mentioned that it will take a while for the agencies to be able to handle the workload. I get the feeling that a lot of the people in the agencies are stalling because they know this is a bad deal as well.

Its amazing to see what kind of society we have become. The lack of ethics and conflict of interest in the congress and senate.

I hate this.

 
Comment by kevin
2008-06-24 17:59:00

“The lack of ethics and conflict of interest in the congress and senate.”

I agree. I work for an aerospace company that was deeply persecuted for conflict of interest and other ethical issues. Now the remaining employees live and breath ethics training and reminders.

What is our thanks for changing our ways? We’ve lost every major contract since.

What I’ve consistently heard is “Oh well congress likes company X these days” as a response to why we keep losing. Maybe it’s just a coincidence… :)

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> in your comment.