The Problem with Bailouts and “Stimulation”

I am deeply concerned with any talk of a stimulation package.  Prior readers know that I vehemently opposed prior bailout packages, and deemed them “Fear Mongering” by the Federal Reserve and our own Treasury Department.  I still feel so, and believe that our new President has been duped by the same economic advisers who led us into this crisis (yes “Timmay” Geithner).  This country really is going to shit.

A quick and useful synopsis of the problem can be found in a small regional paper from Neuces County.

In one of history’s more candid reflections, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., Treasury Secretary under President Franklin D. Roosevelt, confessed, “We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work.”

Just six years after crafting the New Deal, Morgenthau declared that their efforts to create jobs and restore America’s depression-ravaged economy by expanding the federal government to unprecedented levels had been a failure. By Morgenthau’s own assessment, the New Deal saddled our country with “as much unemployment as when we started…and an enormous debt.”

More than 75 years have passed since FDR signed the New Deal into law, and many noted economists are studying the Great Depression and trying to learn from the experience. In 2004, a team of UCLA economists concluded that the policies of the New Deal, which suppressed competition and kept unemployment in the range of nine to 16 percent, actually prolonged the Great Depression by seven years.

Amity Shlaes, an economic scholar and Great Depression historian, has argued that the sheer “arbitrariness” of the New Deal actually exacerbated the crisis.

The crux of the problem is that once you start arbitrarily trying to assign a value better than the collective wisdom of markets, you create a process of compensating factors.  Yes, markets will react only temporarily to any stimulus and will eventually revert to its given path.  Any stimulus will have been wasted.

Yes, payments to “new homeowners” is an arbitrary effort, almost all of whose profits will go to homebuilders (who led us into this mess with overbuilding due to overstimulus) and bankers (who also led us into this mess with overlending due to overstimulus).

I will state categorically that from an economic standpoint, the best thing for the federal government to do is to spend its money on permanent solutions to permanent problems.  Trying to prop up housing prices only leaves us further in debt and beholden to our own currency.  This will not end well, and is getting worse with every dollar given to the Federal Government.

I am outraged at President Obama’s approach.  Unfortunately, it appears that we will have at least 4 more years of unmitigated idiocy, this time aided and abetted by our own Congress.  There is no incentive in America to work hard, do what is right and pay your bills.  Indeed, it seems, never was there a time where it was more prudent to default than now.  You will get to keep all of your past gains, and the government will continue to fund your gains in perpetuity. I’m frankly disgusted that my tax money is going to scum-of-the-earth bankers and homebuilders.

We could really do well to take our tough medicine now and get it over with so we have some growth.  Instead, we have special interests running this country with threats of financial terrorism (give me billions or I’ll blow up your economy and myself) and an out of control President just weeks after taking office.

I’ll give the President a suggestion:  Give me the money and I’ll find a better way to use it.  I’ll set up a bank that will RIGHT NOW hire people, lend to people at below market rates AND make shitloads of money all at the same time.  This absolute garbage of giving current banks TARP money was from the beginning doomed to failure.  I’d like to have loans at 0% that I can then compound 10 times and sell on the open market at 4.5%.

President Obama, I’m ready.  I’m willing.  Just give me the money.

PS, if I happen to take the money and skip town, chalk it up to learning a lesson about giving billions to an anonymous internet blogger.

Tagged with:
 

Count De Monet

Periodically, I look at homes in the area that have been on the market for an extended period of time in my Happy Birthday Socal posts.  This one is similar in that it hearkens back almost 2 years from its original listing date, and exactly shows the greed, stupidity, and laziness of the last 5 years on Socal.

Many of you remember the Mel Brooks’ production of “History of the World Part II” that dissects several historical well-known stories and presents them in a humorous fashion.  One of the best known sections is from France’s pre-revolutionary period where the king takes what he wants when he wants it while his ruling elite rape the country.   One of the funnier characters is a count (Count De Monet) whose name is routinely mispronounced to sound something like “Count The Money”.  To which he repeats the proper pronunciation, “Day Monay, Day Monay!”

countdemonet

The history of the bubble in SoCal can be summed up by several trends indicated by this home.

1.  The Oh Shit! I phase.  This is when people realize their house is going up in value fast enough to make them feel good.

2.  The Oh Shit! II phase.  This is when people realize they can actually take free money out of their house and pay for shit.

3.  The Oh Shit! III phase.  This is when people realize they can barely afford all of the free money they just got.

4.  The Oh Shit! IV phase.  This is when people realize all they have to do is just sell it, pay off debts and they make more.

5.  The Oh Shit! V phase.  This is when people realize that while selling and making money is all and good, they need to actually get it moved, so they lower the price to the point they break even.

6.  The OH Shit! VI phase.  This is when people realize that they can’t even break even after taking money out, so they might as well offload it at a ridiculous price just to be rid of the albatross.

7.  The Oh Shit! VII phase.  This is when people realize that even that ridiculous  price is not low enough to get attention.

It seems we are precisely at this point with a house in Laguna Niguel on Rue De Monet, or perhaps could be renamed Rue the Money.  Of course, Rue is french for avenue, so it can mean several things, but I doubt this “owner” has ever hated the money he got out of his home.

countthemoney

This money has come via a cash-out refi, which is why the house is listed as a “short sale” more than $200K above the owner’s purchase price some 6 years earlier.

What has infuriated most of the mainstream media and bloggers alike is the lack of outrage on this kind of blatant manipulation.  During 2008, these kinds of gains were deemed nontaxable when you walk away from your property; by foreclosure or short sale.  So, the owner walks away with $200K of free cash money.  Meanwhile, normal people who work for a living would need to make nearly $350K before taxes to equal the amount of money siphoned off of this house.  If I weren’t so outraged, I’d find that funny.

But, this isn’t cherry picking; if you can show me a short sale listed, I can show you greed and stupidity.  The surprise is how stupid our lawmakers are that they think that somehow “saving” this kind of homeowner is worthwhile.  The only thing that it does is encourage the next person to do the same.  And, by penalizing the bank by allowing the homeowner to walk away unscathed, they’re making it more difficult for credit to be had by those who are more deserving.  Indeed, the only thing current legislation does is to make it more difficult for everyone except for the financially irresponsible.

The only thing left for lawmakers to stupidly do is to write down mortgages and have taxpayers foot the bill, or is that already happening?  I lose track with the level of stupidity.  Once it goes beyond “moronic” I lose track.

Meanwhile, homeowners who bought before 2003 in Orange County are able to “count de money” at prudent taxpayer’s expense.

Until homeowners can afford the homes they buy, prices will be falling; and by current measures, we’re still nowhere near the bottom in most areas.