Hint: It’s not from our own corrupt government; and I think the answer will surprise you:
Ladies and gentlemen,
Unfortunately, we have so far failed to comprehend the true scale of the ongoing crisis. But one thing is obvious: the extent of the recession and its scale will largely depend on specific high-precision measures, due to be charted by governments and business communities and on our coordinated and professional efforts. In our opinion, we must first atone for the past and open our cards, so to speak. This means we must assess the real situation and write off all hopeless debts and “bad” assets. True, this will be an extremely painful and unpleasant process. Far from everyone can accept such measures, fearing for their capitalisation, bonuses or reputation. However, we would “conserve” and prolong the crisis, unless we clean up our balance sheets. I believe financial authorities must work out the required mechanism for writing off debts that corresponds to today’s needs. Second. Apart from cleaning up our balance sheets, it is high time we got rid of virtual money, exaggerated reports and dubious ratings. We must not harbour any illusions while assessing the state of the global economy and the real corporate standing, even if such assessments are made by major auditors and analysts.
In effect, our proposal implies that the audit, accounting and ratings system reform must be based on a reversion to the fundamental asset value concept. In other words, assessments of each individual business must be based on its ability to generate added value, rather than on subjective concepts. In our opinion, the economy of the future must become an economy of real values. How to achieve this is not so clear-cut. Let us think about it together.
Third. Excessive dependence on a single reserve currency is dangerous for the global economy. Consequently, it would be sensible to encourage the objective process of creating several strong reserve currencies in the future. It is high time we launched a detailed discussion of methods to facilitate a smooth and irreversible switchover to the new model.
Fourth. Most nations convert their international reserves into foreign currencies and must therefore be convinced that they are reliable. Those issuing reserve and accounting currencies are objectively interested in their use by other states. This highlights mutual interests and interdependence. Consequently, it is important that reserve currency issuers must implement more open monetary policies. Moreover, these nations must pledge to abide by internationally recognised rules of macroeconomic and financial discipline. In our opinion, this demand is not excessive. At the same time, the global financial system is not the only element in need of reforms. We are facing a much broader range of problems. This means that a system based on cooperation between several major centres must replace the obsolete unipolar world concept. We must strengthen the system of global regulators based on international law and a system of multilateral agreements in order to prevent chaos and unpredictability in such a multipolar world. Consequently, it is very important that we reassess the role of leading international organisations and institutions.
If only we could have this kind of leadership in this country. I was convinced that Obama would not simply revert to politics as usual, and my hopes have been severly dashed. We are screwed up more than I thought. You cannot fix free markets with state intervention; our speaker will attest to that.

The most interesting part..
“Frankly speaking, we all know that provoking military and political instability, regional and other conflicts is a helpful means of distracting the public from growing social and economic problems. Such attempts cannot be ruled out, unfortunately.”
-Putin
Ding ding ding!
We have a winner. I find it humorous, if not downright scary that Putin embraces free markets (if nothing more than as window dressing) more than our politicians do openly. It’s a sad day for free markets in America.
Chuck
Frankly, I can’t understand how you were caught up with Obama. He seems like a nice enough guy but he was the most liberal member of the Senate…it wasn’t hard to predict his fiscal policy.
Anywaym, Great post. I love your blog. I’m glad you’re posting more frequently.
Well,
If by “you” you mean “me”, that’s actually not correct. I only endorsed one candidate, who was unelectable in the last campaign, Ron Paul.
I did a write-in of his name.
Chuck
Fair enough. I guess i incorrectly read between the lines reading your posts…”I wonder how much is right now buyer’s remorse”…and…”I was convinced that Obama would not simply revert to politics as usual”…
I agree Ron Paul was pretty spot on with the economic stuff. You’re right though, he was unelectable. Besides being a 3rd party candidate and not having ‘the look’, the ties to racism sunk any chance he had. Americans won’t stand for that. We need a more attractive Libertarian leader.
Yeah, of course, I believed (like those who voted for him) that his being a newcomer might actually play in the positive for him. Unfortunately, I think it only underscores how bad our political system has gotten. The only way to get anything done is through entrenched power brokers. For Obama, doing the wrong something is better than doing the right nothing. Unfortunate.
The system will right itself if politicians will just stop futzing up incentives. It’ll just prolong the pain because the surest way to break a game is to change the rules in the middle.
Chuck Ponzi
Very interesting that Putin said that. What the world doesn’t realize is that there is only one economic system and that’s capitalism.
For every action there is a reaction, if your in a socialist system your still in a capitalist system because in life nothing is free and you pay for everything.
Housing projects are dumps and are not maintained. Minimum wage just means that less people work. No such thing as a free education. Public schools teach servitude.