<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When is the Bottom: Myth Debunking 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socalbubble.com/2009/06/when-is-the-bottom-myth-debunking-1.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2009/06/when-is-the-bottom-myth-debunking-1.html</link>
	<description>Southern California is Experiencing a Real Estate Bubble like never before</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 01:16:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanman</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2009/06/when-is-the-bottom-myth-debunking-1.html/comment-page-1#comment-88914</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 06:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/?p=681#comment-88914</guid>
		<description>I Really enjoy reading about the socal bubble and bust. Up in Canada, we&#039;re about 18-24 months behind. 

In Spring with interest rates so low and the spring bounce, prices actually have gone up a couple of percentages.

I look at SouthernCal as the leader that most if not all that North American provinces/states follow.

Been reading the past two years, thanks for the blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Really enjoy reading about the socal bubble and bust. Up in Canada, we&#8217;re about 18-24 months behind. </p>
<p>In Spring with interest rates so low and the spring bounce, prices actually have gone up a couple of percentages.</p>
<p>I look at SouthernCal as the leader that most if not all that North American provinces/states follow.</p>
<p>Been reading the past two years, thanks for the blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Chediak</title>
		<link>http://www.socalbubble.com/2009/06/when-is-the-bottom-myth-debunking-1.html/comment-page-1#comment-88738</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Chediak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalbubble.com/?p=681#comment-88738</guid>
		<description>Chuck,

This should be a great series.  Thanks.  The whole buy vs rent question really intrigues me.  We are renting now.  If housing prices remains flat (or negative), we&#039;re better off renting, since we can leave the money which would otherwise go for a down payment in the financial markets, making (an average of, say, 8%).  If I assume 2% growth rate in home price over 4 years, and assume that my down payment money could have made 8% in the market, my effective monthly cost (after considering tax benefits, and proceeds on the sale of the home, less realty commisions) for owning a home purchased for $390K is $2560.  But I could probably get something nicer for that price renting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck,</p>
<p>This should be a great series.  Thanks.  The whole buy vs rent question really intrigues me.  We are renting now.  If housing prices remains flat (or negative), we&#8217;re better off renting, since we can leave the money which would otherwise go for a down payment in the financial markets, making (an average of, say, 8%).  If I assume 2% growth rate in home price over 4 years, and assume that my down payment money could have made 8% in the market, my effective monthly cost (after considering tax benefits, and proceeds on the sale of the home, less realty commisions) for owning a home purchased for $390K is $2560.  But I could probably get something nicer for that price renting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

