There is a lot being tossed around about the stimulus package that is being shuttled through the house and senate. One of the proposed amendments is the slackening of the conforming limits, especially in an area of high housing prices. Most other bubble bloggers have stood against this, dismissing it as another affordability enhancing intended vehicle that will only keep prices above what a normal buyer should be able to afford. I’m going to break from that camp for the following reasons:

1. I feel that a seemingly arbitrary limit of access to credit imposed based on a nationwide median price is unfitting for high-cost and high-income regional areas.

2. Affordability is the issue, and indeed, I feel it should be addressed. I would rather see a local median-income based payment cap, along with mandated dti (debt to income) ratios.

3. Even by expanding the current set of available products won’t help the already under water homeowners, nor does it change the economics of the rent/buy equation.  Basically, it has little or no impact to the bubble.  If you can rent long-term in a high-priced area, why shouldn’t you have access to credit?

4.  The bubble was created by speculation and “affordability products”.  While nothing occurs in a vacuum, the bubble is not going to be reinflated without new affordability products and lax lending standards; something that is not going to happen in this environment.

5.  Indeed, I believe that like many speculators caught up in the positive frenzy of the real estate market, it is easy to be caught up in the pessimistic view as it tumbles.  One sign of the bottom is when everyone agrees that the product is no longer worthy of investment, and to be shunned.  We still have a long way to go, but there is no reason to overblow the risks and rewards.

In the end, creating more access to credit does not translate into overpriced homes.  Most of the problems created have already been solved in the debt market; a return to sane underwriting is already underway.  The pricing of housing is inconceivably out of whack, but will plummet for the next 2 or 3 years as the imbalances are worked out.

Besides, the current jumbo market is in disarray, adding sane underwriting to that market while not increasing the GSE’s limits can provide competitive air to the otherwise broken market.

This is not to say that it won’t have its faults… with a limited amount of funding going on, the GSEs will likely need to ration the available funds.  Price, however, is most often the best rationing device one can create.  Any way you look at it, the bubble has burst, nothing will change that.  In case you haven’t noticed, I’m not left-leaning that I believe everyone should be able to afford a house.  For many people, they have no propensity to be natural caretakers for an asset as costly and long-term as owning real estate.  Many of those people are already in homes they can barely afford, or worse, dashing their credit on the rocks of the “American Dream”; which up until 30 years ago was about starting their own business and succeeding financially, not owning a home.  Consider how far we have strayed from the path of free enterprise.

 

Balrog

Housing bubble apologists often dismissed bubble believers’ concerns out of hand with the following party line: Southern California’s prices only fell last time due to substantial job losses due to the dislocation of the defense industry. (no matter that the Eastern Seaboard had a similarly-timed slide and did not attribute it to the same) Such job losses cannot happen again; the job market is too strong, diversified, and recession proof.

In a number of past posts, I have connected the dots related to current job strength, even while realizing that it was not just the number of jobs, but in particular, the type of jobs that matters when it comes to affordability. Indeed, it is important that the prices of houses are not supported by those that already live in an area, but rather by those who are coming to an area. On the flipside, as an area becomes too expensive, those unable, unwilling to remain, or tempted by their good fortune will sell to realize their gain and move elsewhere. We have already seen San Diego County’s negative growth rate (in spite of a substantially increased housing stock). These moves happen slowly, and reacclimating boiled frogs to lukewarm pots makes them believe they are actually in frigid arctic waters.

What the mainstream media failed terribly to see was that it is exactly the excesses created during the bubble that must be punished in a downturn. First, it was the mantra that Real estate never goes down. Then, it was a “soft patch”. Later, a “Soft Landing”. Then “A souffle’”. All of those jobs due to lending and construction that have paved the way to even higher housing prices have now turned into a vicious downcycle. Remember that the “Zombie Financial Media Awareness Week” is just a few weeks away. Why is it that the media has no memory that bubble blogs were appearing in early to mid 2005, warning of excesses in lending and finance?

Perhaps just as appropriately, one would ask, why are their virtual undead still haunting the pages of major news outlets. Featured writers, no less, that give denial a new face. It might be valuable to read what Wikipedia has to say about denial before visting one of our local train wrecks.

from Wikipedia:

Denial is a defense mechanism in which a person is faced with a fact that is too painful to accept and rejects it instead, insisting that it is not true despite what may be overwhelming evidence. The subject may deny the reality of the unpleasant fact altogether (simple denial), admit the fact but deny its seriousness (minimisation) or admit both the fact and seriousness but deny responsibility (transference). The concept of denial is particularly important to the study of addiction.

After reading that, you might be able to find perhaps even a bit of humor in a piece written by our own lovable village dolt based out of San Diego, George Chamberlain just last week:

Let me begin by passing along my congratulations to the many people who are celebrating the current situation in the housing market. In concert with much of the national and local media, they have been able to artificially construct something that has never —- I repeat, never —- been done before: drive down housing prices at a time when unemployment is low, the economy is booming and consumer confidence is approaching record highs.

A column I wrote about a year ago on the housing market triggered more hate mail than any other topic that I have discussed. I needed to check underneath my car and use a food taster for a couple of weeks after I suggested that the situation was dramatically overstated.

That this level of denial exists, is not prima facie a surprise. That a person so disconnected from reality, even after it is made known to the world can get published can only mean 2 things. Either the editor couldn’t care less about what is being written, or is in similar denial. Not once does the discussion turn to the primary driver of housing prices; job creation. Stagnation can already force prices down with an increasing housing stock; much more with out-migration.

If you read the entire piece, you’ll see that his article exhibits a number of different defense mechanisms. From minimisation to transference to outright denial. One might wonder if he is addicted to house price appreciation. We sure know many San Diegans are addicted… and their only fix is through another equity extraction. Wall Street just shut off the spigot, and it’s very interesting the stages of grief that participants go through as an outsider.

It wasn’t hard to spot where our problems lied, even a year or 2 ago. Jonathan Lansner was able to identify some time ago that housing related to 17% of Orange County’s entire job base. Many observers have noted that a healthy balance is between 6% and 12%. Just to bring us to parity with a healthy balance, we would have to increase our unemployment figures by 5% to 11% of the total workforce. Those are depression-level statistics.

As scary and frightening as they may seem, there are some actions that they everyday person should have done in the past 2 years: (and might still be able to pull off before the slide gains even more steam)

1. Eliminate any speculation that is lending or real estate related: sell any properties, refinance historic-low fixed rates, sell homebuilder or financial stocks, mutual funds, and even banks.

2. Housing-recession proof your career. Find a new one, or develop your business plan to excel when downturns happen.

3. Reduce debt, and raise cash or liquid investments. This one will allow you to ride out any temporary storms as well as purchase property in 3 to 5 years from now when they once again return to appropriate levels.

4. Pay off any adjustable debt, hoard cash. Many people are carrying unhealthy levels of debt. While comical, the man riding the lawnmower in debt up to his eyeballs is all too real in America. Don’t be the person who loses their home to out of control personal expenses.

If George Chamberlain wants positive to come out of this, Southern Californians need to break their cultural pathology and begin to save, invest, and build, rather than consume. Otherwise, there is nothing for us to look forward to. Last time, the scapegoat was the defense industry. This time, it will be the “Subprime Implosion”. Years from now, people will attribute the downturn, not with the excesses that led to it (that would mean assigning the blame to ourselves and our human nature), but with the trigger that collapsed the house of cards we had built.

We have met the enemy and he is us.

 

After my last post, one might believe that real estate agents have no other opinion than the mantra of “housing prices only go up”. For those ill-informed and those lacking true experience in a down market (or at least studied one out more than attending a Gary Watts cheerleading session), there is little to convince them outside of the crushing pressure of the future markets.

On the other hand, there are agents who will actually flourish in the coming real estate bubble pop. These hardened souls know the importance of negotiation, and have experience to back it up. Agents like these are well worth their six percent. I came across just one of these recently. I have only had brief contact with his business partner Lina, but after reading his website, I am convinced he’s at least going to maintain his business while many others like our aforementioned Mr. Pannatoni are going to scramble. Embracing change is key to managing it.

Turning to his site, we read:

The Return Of The Short Sale

If you lived in the Shadowridge area or anywhere else in California about fifteen years ago and owned a home, you probably remember short sales – they are back.

A recent report from Sacramento sounds eerily similar to the 1990-1996 California real estate bust, except this time, home prices are multiples of what they were back then, therefore….so will be the drop!

I have been talking about inflated home values and financing foolishness for several years now. In 2000 or so, there were the 125% loans, scary, but home values began marching upwards as real estate looked attractive to the folks who had chased the .coms.
Folks wanted to grow what they had made or rebuild what they had bled in the stock markets.

Greenspan had raised interest rates decimating investments that were already overvalued causing a mass exodus from the equity markets into real estate. Then rates dropped again and property values begin to rise further. Builders who were behind on keeping up with housing demand began to build like mad. In addition, the folks to begin to, once again, speculate in real estate just as they did in the stock market. It was easy because of technology and the web.

Day trade this stock….flip this house!

Now, the folks who can really afford to own a home, are seemingly leaving California in droves. We have lots of people coming but not the type who can afford to buy these homes. These new citizens are more likely to use our social services and put a burden on our resources.

I don’t know if the statistics show it (I haven’t bothered to check), I just know the termite inspector we use told me 18 months ago that 3 out of 5 of the homeowners who he is doing inspections for, are leaving the state. And this continues.

With so many homes at such high prices and so few buyers, what happens?

The 35% property value drop that we saw between 1991 and 1994, that’s what happens.

Thirty Five Percent. That was pretty much the price drop we saw across southern California during that period. There were pockets that did better, there always are. But, pretty much across the board in southern California, the home prices dropped by 35% or more.

I remember, I was selling foreclosures and doing short sales for homeowners in the Shadowridge area during that time. By the way, what was your real estate agent doing back then? This would be a good question to ask them, before you list your home for sale of course!

The possibility of a short sale arises when you need to sell your house, but you owe more than it’s worth – like a fully-financed new car being driven off the dealer’s lot, you are “upside-down” on your loan as soon as your tail lights have crossed the curb.

That is exactly what has happened to thousands of homeowners who, for a variety of reasons, should never have bought homes but did. Most of them putting no money down. Many of these homeowners are also investors who own more than one home. Speculating on real estate just like they did in stocks.

Here’s the rub. If, for one reason or another, these homeowners must sell, then they are faced with a few choices, none of which are very appealing:

-Sell the house, and pay the difference to the lender…right

-Walk away, and give the house back to the lender…the lender doesn’t want it but will foreclose if they must or,

-Make a deal with the lender so they don’t wind up with another foreclosure.

I specialized in this sort of thing in the 1990s; luckily for many, I have dusted off my short sale notebook and am now helping people hand their homes back to their lender with the least amount of hassle.

I am becoming a very busy guy.

I have no doubt he is going to be a very busy guy. San Diego County is encountering its share of short sales now.

Thirty Five Percent was a lot back then, and it’s even more now. He could be spot on with his predictions, even if it is just a “back of the napkin” calculation.

 

Twisted ARMs

Ever explained to someone that the housing bubble in California is just a blowoff of speculative demand, only to be rebuffed by some pseudo edumuhcashun truthiness about how so many people want to live here, blah blah blah, great weather, blah blah blah, people make a lot of money here, blah blah blah, construction costs, blah blah blah, land use restrictions, blah blah blah and so on blather?

Would you just love to stick something in their face that breaks it down scientifically and proves them all wrong?  Something that shows exactly how much these variables changed the cost of living here?  Wouldn’t you love to get your hands on exactly that piece of information?  Wouldn’t you love to prove in graphs and numbers that the variables they just mentioned had little to no effect on prices, while it was exactly the proliferation of ARMs that did it?

Wouldn’t you love that piece of work to include formulas such as this:

Function of home price appreciation variables

And written by a professor of finance at a California university? 

What if I told you that exactly such a paper exists that delves into California’s history of home prices discussion that includes a detailed explanation of what caused the home price explosion?  It does exist.

Here’s a rundown of the conclusions:

California’s Housing Bubble Explained

Well, have I whetted your appetite enough to sit through 30 minutes of mind-tearing edumuhcashun to get to the data behind the pretty little graph I pounded out?

Here it is.

 

Are People Really That Dense?

Last stick-at-the-top discussion was about the ongoing pressure of lending on homebuying… whether there really are any changes taking place.

For this discussion, are there people still flipping houses? Do you see them? Have they listed and relisted several times? Is anyone selling, and who is buying them?

Do you see anyone, or know anyone who is thinking of flipping houses?

I have a work colleague who is anxiously awaiting his a family member’s death so he can take their inheritance and begin “flipping properties in earnest”. Is that sick or what?

What evidence do you see?

 

The Consequences of Land Speculation

Upton Sinclair’s classic “The Consequences of Land Speculation are Tenantry and Debt on the Farms, and Slums and Luxury in the Cities” has the ring of a true liberal, yet fundamentalist in its values. Written nearly a century ago, many of his concerns ring true even today.

How do you see his views, and should it be generally accepted that land has a value that grows over time, and therefore should be taxed according to that value? Or, does land have only a value that changes when exchanged?

Why is California’s Prop13 making millionaires richer while making the poor man poorer?

It is as Upton says?

Our opponents, the great rich bankers and land speculators of California, persuaded the poor man that we were going to put all taxes on this poor man’s lot, and to let the rich man’s stocks and bonds, his inheritance, his wife’s jewels, and all his income, escape taxation.

Or was he just another socialist?

Is Prop13 a fair tax where wealthy landowners are able to hold hundreds of millions of dollars in real estate free from fair value taxation and able to pass it from interest to interest by means of incorporation? Why are the poor of the state so easily duped by fears that they too may be priced out? Because, if taxation were value based, there would be little use for speculators to hold land for long periods of time, all land would be employed in some useful endeavor, or returned to the market in favor of capital.

As Upton Sinclair said:

This condition wrecked every empire in the history of mankind, and it is wrecking modern civilization. One of the first to perceive this was Henry George, and he worked out the program known as the Single Tax. Let society as a whole take the full rental value of land, so that no one would any longer be able to hold land out of use. So the value of land would decrease, and everyone could have land, and the community would have a great income to be spent for social ends.

Are the truths written nearly 100 years ago just prior to the Great Depression as true today as they were then?